Relation between Leader Behaviors and Subordinate †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Relation between Leader Behaviors and Subordinate. Answer: The path goal theory of leadership is a particular model which is based on the specification of a leaders behaviour or a style which is best suited for the employee and the work environment for achieving a goal. The goal is to increase the motivation of the employees, cause their empowerment and also satisfaction in order to become productive members in the organisation (Hayyat Malik 2012). The path goal approach is based on the expectancy theory which explains the fact that an individual will work in a certain way based on the expectation that their act will be followed by a certain outcome. The path goal style of leadership is the most important process in which the leaders select particular behaviours which are best suited to the needs of the employees. This is also necessary to guide their employees and their needs to best guide them through the path which they need to follow to achieve results (Antonakis and House 2013). In the given case study provided, the employees are experienced and skilled to perform certain tasks which pertain to the needs of the customers. The path goal approach is appropriate in this case as the customers can get services based on their specific demands. Other leadership styles such as transactional style, the laissez-faire style, transformational style are not best in this particular case as the needs and requirements of the case study as different. The authoritative styles are not applicable as the employees need to achieve person specific goals in this particular case. References: Antonakis, J. and House, R.J., 2013. The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. InTransformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition(pp. 3-33). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Hayyat Malik, S., 2012. A Study of Relationship between Leader Behaviors and Subordinate Job Expectancies: A Path-Goal Approach.Pakistan Journal of Commerce Social Sciences,6(2).